GCON: Difference between revisions

From MediaWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==General==
GTOM considers human mind based on a few foundations:
    • knowledge phenomenon, as a primary foundation;
    • time-space paradigm, as a perception feature/interface.


===Knowledge===
==Hypothesis #2: Gativus Hypothesis on Consciousness, Mind, and Thought==
Existence of knowledge entities (concepts) – is a fact.
Gativus hypothesizes that '''Consciousness, Mind, and Thought''' are grounded in a '''cognitive/knowledge network (GCON)'''. This network is composed of:
Knowledge entities KLEN form GCON (Gativus Cognitive network) – as sub-network of GNET.
GTOM consider that Knowledge entities KLEN are based on RDF’s triples, with some extensions:
    • the predicate – would be various types, and represents  Targets, Activities or Events;
    • Subjects and Objects – would be numerous in one entity. Technically, they are not included into KLEN, but taking part in it by special participation relation (PARR), which are the part of KLEN;
    • KLEN also includes sequence relations (SEQR) between Targets;
    • KLEN  has a sequence status: future, present, and past. The sequence status is the only time association in GTOM.
Technically, the Knowledge entity – is the behavior, which changes the existing network by amending of existing or creating a new entities (subjects or targets). The changes are relayed by PARR relations.


The identification of KLEN – is same of NDDI containing the T-component.  
# '''Knowledge Entities (KLEN)''', and
Creation of a New concept (target or subject) could result in creation the new NDDI with corresponding T/C components, or corresponding components can be hosted in the same NDDI.
# '''Specific relations''' interconnecting these KLENs.
===Time-space===
 
Gativus GTOM considers time/space as interface for knowledge exchange between two or more subjects with consciousness (like homo sapiens).
=== Definition and Inspiration for KLEN ===
The basic prototype is based on UML: class and activity diagrams.
The concept of '''KLEN''' is inspired by the '''Resource Description Framework (RDF)''' but extends it significantly to incorporate:
Activity diagram is associated with sequence relation SEQR between Targets, while class diagram can be seen as participation relations PARR between subject Concepts and consuming them Targets.
 
* '''Behavioural activity''' capabilities, and
* Support for '''multiple subjects and objects''' in its structure.
 
To describe the behavioral nature of KLENs effectively, '''UML activity diagrams''' and '''BPMN notation''' are considered the most mature and widely accepted tools. These notations align with the knowledge base of the majority of computer specialists and provide robust methodologies for modelling dynamic behaviours.
 
=== KLEN Construction and Representation ===
KLENs are constructed using the '''Gativus Network Notation (GNOT)'''. Their design maintains associations with:
 
* '''RDF principles''', and
* '''UML class and activity diagrams'''.
 
A detailed representation of KLEN construction within GNOT, including these associations, is illustrated below.
 
<gallery mode="nolines" widths="540" heights="480" perrow="2">
File:Base animation.mp4
File:G-NOT with shadow.png
</gallery>
 
==See also==
 
*[[GTOM |'''Axiom #1''': The Human Brain and Multiple Networks]]
* [[OMAP|'''Hypothesis #3''': Gativus Hypothesis on the Cognitive Network and Objective Map (OMAP)]]
*[[OPNT|'''Hypothesis #4''': Gativus Operating Network (OPNT)]]

Latest revision as of 09:08, 16 December 2024

Hypothesis #2: Gativus Hypothesis on Consciousness, Mind, and Thought

Gativus hypothesizes that Consciousness, Mind, and Thought are grounded in a cognitive/knowledge network (GCON). This network is composed of:

  1. Knowledge Entities (KLEN), and
  2. Specific relations interconnecting these KLENs.

Definition and Inspiration for KLEN

The concept of KLEN is inspired by the Resource Description Framework (RDF) but extends it significantly to incorporate:

  • Behavioural activity capabilities, and
  • Support for multiple subjects and objects in its structure.

To describe the behavioral nature of KLENs effectively, UML activity diagrams and BPMN notation are considered the most mature and widely accepted tools. These notations align with the knowledge base of the majority of computer specialists and provide robust methodologies for modelling dynamic behaviours.

KLEN Construction and Representation

KLENs are constructed using the Gativus Network Notation (GNOT). Their design maintains associations with:

  • RDF principles, and
  • UML class and activity diagrams.

A detailed representation of KLEN construction within GNOT, including these associations, is illustrated below.

See also

Retrieved from "https://zh.wiki.gativus.com/index.php?title=GCON&oldid=1209"