OMAP: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Крыса в лабиринте.jpg|thumb|left]] | [[File:Крыса в лабиринте.jpg|thumb|left]] | ||
== Hypothesis #3: Gativus Hypothesis on the Cognitive Network and Objective Map (OMAP)== | |||
Gativus hypothesizes that a cognitive network, referred to as the '''Gativus Cognitive Network (GCOM)''', is fundamentally based on the '''Objective Map (OMAP)'''. | Gativus hypothesizes that a cognitive network, referred to as the '''Gativus Cognitive Network (GCOM)''', is fundamentally based on the '''Objective Map (OMAP)'''. | ||
Latest revision as of 07:45, 16 December 2024
Hypothesis #3: Gativus Hypothesis on the Cognitive Network and Objective Map (OMAP)
Gativus hypothesizes that a cognitive network, referred to as the Gativus Cognitive Network (GCOM), is fundamentally based on the Objective Map (OMAP).
Gativus supports research suggesting that the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex play critical roles in producing 3D mapping, memory, and time perception within an organism. From a technical perspective, these brain regions likely form a specialized network that generates all necessary data for route calculations and performs the calculations themselves. The outcomes of these activities—events—are stored as experiences and utilized for learning, enabling the creation of new routes and refining calculation techniques.
Within the GCOM, stored data is represented as a set of objects and their interrelations, referred to as Knowledge Entities (KLENs):
- Some KLENs, like living areas and vertical restrictions (e.g., walls), exhibit static features.
- Other KLENs, such as organisms and targets, possess subject/object features and demonstrate behavioral activity.
Objective Map Visualization
In Gativus's vision, the fundamental Objective Map (OMAP) framework would resemble the diagram depicted. The visualization of OMAP is based on the Gativus Network Notation (GNOT).