|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[File:Крыса в лабиринте.jpg|thumb|left]] | | [[File:112-265 OMAP introduction.mp4|thumb|left]] |
| == Hypothesis #4: Objective Map (part 1)== | | == Hypothesis #4: Objective Map (part 1)== |
| Gativus hypothesizes that a cognitive network, referred to as the '''Gativus Cognitive Network (GCOM)''', is fundamentally based on the '''Objective Map (OMAP)'''.
| | Objective map Introduction |
| | |
| Gativus supports research suggesting that the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex play critical roles in producing 3D mapping, memory, and time perception within an organism. From a technical perspective, these brain regions likely form a specialized network that generates all necessary data for route calculations and performs the calculations themselves. The outcomes of these activities—events—are stored as experiences and utilized for learning, enabling the creation of new routes and refining calculation techniques.
| |
| | |
| Within the GCOM, stored data is represented as a '''set of objects''' and their interrelations, referred to as '''Knowledge Entities (KLENs)''':
| |
| | |
| * Some KLENs, like living areas and vertical restrictions (e.g., walls), exhibit '''static features'''.
| |
| * Other KLENs, such as organisms and targets, possess '''subject/object features''' and demonstrate '''behavioral activity'''.
| |
| | |
| === Objective Map Visualization ===
| |
| In Gativus's vision, the fundamental Objective Map (OMAP) framework would resemble the diagram depicted. The visualization of OMAP is based on the '''Gativus Network Notation (GNOT)'''.
| |
|
| |
|
| === Next article === | | === Next article === |
| <hr> | | <hr> |
| [[OMAP2|'''Hypothesis #4:''' Objective Map (part 2)]] | | [[OMAP2|'''Hypothesis #4:''' Objective Map (part 2)]] |
Revision as of 04:34, 11 February 2025
